What were the stated reasons for using the atomic bomb at the end of World war 2?

What were the stated reasons for using the atomic bomb at the end of World war 2?

Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military. A Normandy-type amphibious landing would have cost an estimated million casualties. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well. Prolonging the war was not an option for the President.

Why were the atomic bombs needed?

Official A-Bomb Justification: Save US Lives According to Truman and others in his administration, the use of the atomic bomb was intended to cut the war in the Pacific short, avoiding a U.S. invasion of Japan and saving hundreds of thousands of American lives.

What were the effects of the atomic bombs?

The uranium bomb detonated over Hiroshima on 6 August 1945 had an explosive yield equal to 15,000 tonnes of TNT. It razed and burnt around 70 per cent of all buildings and caused an estimated 140,000 deaths by the end of 1945, along with increased rates of cancer and chronic disease among the survivors.

Why was the use of atomic bombs necessary?

Some have argued in favor of the use of the bombs for a range of reasons, including: it ended the war, it saved the lives of millions, and it was necessary for the emerging Cold War with the Soviet Union.

Why was the atomic bomb dropped in World War 2?

The action of dropping the two atomic bombs issued in an era of global peace. The conclusion of World War II created a shift in priorities for the world’s governments. The United Nations came about as an organization to fill in the gap left by the first attempt at the League of Nations.

Why was the atomic bombing of Japan controversial?

The atomic bombing of Japan at the end of World War II by the United States is one of the most debated and controversial topics in all of history. Since the bombing in 1945, historians have debated whether or not the United States was justified in using the two atomic bombs to end the war.

Why did the US want to bomb Japan?

Based on this evidence, the United States argued that a land invasion of the main islands, which had millions more Japanese people, may end up costing the lives of many more Japanese people than would die by the two atomic bomb blasts.